AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer) [LWN.net]

AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer)

Posted Jul 3, 2007 23:52 UTC (Tue) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
In reply to: AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer) by k8to
Parent article: AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer)

It's suppose to be working in the Linux drivers I beleive. I think they are a bit more advanced then the equivelent Windows drivers.

I am curious.

What versions of everything are you using? X.org, Kernel, distro, motherboard etc etc.

I would like to get a X3000 motherboard to replace my perfectly stable GMA 950, but it's hard for me to justify spending another hundred bucks to replace a already working motherboard.

I am curious about the actual performance of the thing. The only benchmarks that I've seen were only for the GMA 3000 which lack the extra hardware features.

(Log in to post comments)

AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer)

Posted Jul 6, 2007 12:55 UTC (Fri) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]

X.org 7.2, Kernel 2.6.21.IForget. The motherboard is an asus job but it's really irrelevant. It's an Intel G965 chipset and video, and the only variations here are things IDE controllers.

The problem could well be debian's build of X.org, or the dri component, or perhaps the fact that I've an amd 64 box and kernel, but the dri in this question is 32 bit x86 (wine games), which is all supposed to work fine, but might not be as well tested.

I'm sure I could be helping the developers more with detailed and tenacious reports but I'm losing interest in that sort of thing over the years. The specs for the hardware are open, the company behind the hardware wants to make Linux stuff work well and is paying developers to do so. I really don't see why it doesn't just work already. Sure I understand development takes time but this is no longer new hardware.