| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Author's response
Author's response
Posted Jul 3, 2007 1:54 UTC (Tue) by gdt (subscriber, #6284)In reply to: AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer) by drag
Parent article: AMD applies make-up to the face of its Linux Control Centre (the Inquirer)
I responded to the author:
Hi Fernando,
When doing a review its usual to compare the product with its competition. To my mind Intel wins hands-down on usability -- the drivers come with the Linux distribution, are invisibly configured by the distribution's installer, and simply work.
The lack of stuffing about that comes with the Intel chipset makes them a winner for 90% of users. That other 10% that needs good OpenGL performance is in a bit of a quandary anyway -- sure the ATI and Nvidia cards are much, much faster but their drivers don't support the eye candy APIs leaving that speed useless to all but Linux gamers (an odd notion that) and movie animators.
Best wishes, Glen
The author responded:
Thanks Glen.
Actually it wasn't a review, but a follow-up story on AMDTI's inability to produce decent drivers.
Not to mention, as you say, the lack of truly open source ones...FC
(Log in to post comments)
Author's response
Posted Jul 4, 2007 11:35 UTC (Wed) by glisse (subscriber, #44837) [Link]
Actualy there is open source driver for AMD hardware up to r500 and likely r600 for 2D, and only up to R400 for 3D with kind of still in development support to be accurate. Oh and 3D support for R500 should come soon in the open source one.
Oh and all 2D drivers support randr 1.2 which makes then a lot easier to configure especialy toward multiscreen. There is still some lacking features for r500/r600 (gamma correction and duallink support come to mind).