Re: Debian Maintainers GR Proposal

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 21/06/2007 alle 17.37 +0200, Bastian Venthur ha scritto:
> > 
> > So, why such a complicated GR introducing second class DDs? Just grant a
> > few more rights to our NMs and try to improve the NM process in the long
> > run and everybody will be happy. 
> 
> Esquisitely true.

Please read what the answers were the last time we had this
discussion on -project.

Bastian already raised those concerns and I already responded to them.
Let's not have the same discussion twice:
Start of thread was here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/03/msg00074.html

Bastian's mail and my answer:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/03/msg00075.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/03/msg00080.html

Another response to similar concerns are here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/03/msg00146.html

In short, this DM status is complementary to NM. It's not working around
any deficiency in the NM process.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org