Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
[Posted June 19, 2007 by corbet]
| From: |
| Al Viro <viro-AT-ftp.linux.org.uk> |
| To: |
| Kevin Fox <Kevin.Fox-AT-pnl.gov> |
| Subject: |
| Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Date: |
| Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:25:00 +0100 |
| Cc: |
| Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton-AT-enter.net>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva-AT-redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org>,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense-AT-csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Greg KH <greg-AT-kroah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev-AT-gmail.com>,
"david-AT-lang.hm" <david-AT-lang.hm>,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan-AT-netone.net.tr>,
linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>, mingo-AT-elte.hu |
| Archive-link: |
| Article,
Thread
|
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:06:31AM -0700, Kevin Fox wrote:
> This whole argument is about the spirit of the GPL. Linus and others
> think the spirit is one thing, the FSF guys think its something else.
What the fsck it is, linux-kernel or bleeding Council of Nikea?
(
Log in to post comments)
