| |||||||||||||
Who wrote - and approved - 2.6.22Who wrote - and approved - 2.6.22Posted Jun 15, 2007 21:23 UTC (Fri) by jkm (guest, #14176)Parent article: Who wrote - and approved - 2.6.22
It's fairly misleading to see Google listed at the top of non-author signoffs by employer, considering only two of the signoffs came from someone other than Andrew.
(Log in to post comments)
Who wrote - and approved - 2.6.22 Posted Jun 20, 2007 21:53 UTC (Wed) by roelofs (guest, #2599) [Link] It's fairly misleading to see Google listed at the top of non-author signoffs by employer, considering only two of the signoffs came from someone other than Andrew.It's hardly any different for Linus/Linux Foundation, is it? Keep in mind that there is at least a vague correlation between number of signoffs performed and (paid) effort expended. Red Hat just spreads theirs around a bit more. ;-) Greg
|
|||||||||||||