| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
An interview with Fedora leader Max SpevackAn interview with Fedora leader Max SpevackPosted Jun 14, 2007 19:29 UTC (Thu) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263)Parent article: An interview with Fedora leader Max Spevack
Yes, RPM (rpm.org) should remain as it is now (or even become smaller, whatever) -- keeping the UNIX principle is key.
(Log in to post comments)
An interview with Fedora leader Max Spevack Posted Jun 21, 2007 1:43 UTC (Thu) by king_inuyasha (guest, #45856) [Link] I agree about that, but I also see that perhaps there should be a method to allow Fedora to have compatibility with the "rpm5" packages. I can see that RPM will never have a unified community, but it would be nice to have a way to port rpm5 packages back to rpm...
|
|
||||||||||||