Re: [patch] procfs/procps threading performance speedup, 2.5.62
[Posted February 26, 2003 by corbet]
| From: |
| Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> |
| To: |
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [patch] procfs/procps threading performance speedup, 2.5.62 |
| Date: |
| Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:06:03 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: |
| linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alex Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>,
<procps-list@redhat.com> |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> the main problem with threads in /proc is that there's a big slowdown when
> using lots of threads.
Well, part of the problem (I think) is that you added all the threads to
the same main directory.
Putting a "." in front of the name doesn't fix the /proc level directory
scalability issues, it only means that you can avoid some of the user-
level scalability ones.
So to offset that bad design, you then add other cruft, like the lookup
cursor and the "." marker. Which is not a bad idea in itself, but I claim
that if you'd made the directory structure saner you wouldn't have needed
it in the first place.
It would just be _so_ much nicer if the threads would show up as
subdirectories ie /proc/<tgid>/<tid>/xxx. More scalable, more readable,
and just generally more sane.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(
Log in to post comments)