Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Google ?Google ?Posted May 24, 2007 9:17 UTC (Thu) by anselm (subscriber, #2796)In reply to: Google ? by ekj Parent article: A day at the Open Source Business Conference
Let's stipulate for a moment that you are right about the »spirit« of the GPL, as applied to web services. The question here is how far down the stack this should extend. Presumably Google are running their own proprietary search engine code, on which the »spirit of the GPL« has no bearing, on top of a possibly-patched Linux kernel. Should they be morally obligated to publish their Linux kernel patches just because the machine in question is running (or even merely talking to another machine running) a web server that is accessible by the public?
(Log in to post comments)
Google ? Posted May 24, 2007 22:57 UTC (Thu) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link] No, something changed.The GPL didn't change, and legal requirements didn't change, but the thing that Stallman sought to regulate with GPL has changed. Much of the computer use that formerly happened via distribution of software now happens by offering a service on the Internet. For example, this year I filed my income tax using a web service, whereas in the past I would pick up a CD at a store. And it looks like that trend will continue. Essentially, we're moving from the Microsoft era to the Google era. So to continue the freedoms GPL hoped to give to computer users, there needs to be something new.
|
|||||||||||||