| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Emacs...Emacs...Posted May 18, 2007 21:21 UTC (Fri) by hein.zelle (guest, #33324)In reply to: Emacs... by zooko Parent article: Waiting for Emacs 22 (and looking forward to Emacs 23)
Indeed, unless the XFT support within emacs shapes up rather soon, I'm seriously starting to consider the impossible - switching to another editor. I'll certainly give xemacs a try if that ever happens.
I'm amazed this is going on for so long without even a properly working cvs version: I'm starting to have serious trouble getting emacs to even use a readible font in modern linux distributions, either with dual screen setups or high resolution displays. I really don't care about emacs and the way it works being old-fashioned, but the font issue had better be resolved sometime soon.
The point someone made about fixing the defaults is also a good one - it's rather prehistoric to have an editor which requires configuration to show colors, not switch the backspace and delete keys (does that still happen? not sure) and to open new files in a running editor process. I also blame distributors here: why don't debian/ubuntu/fedora add these things to a default ~/.emacs file and put it in /etc/skel ? Or put it in the system-wide emacs configuration debian already has?
(Log in to post comments)
Emacs... Posted May 18, 2007 23:21 UTC (Fri) by hein.zelle (guest, #33324) [Link] Well, thankfully Emacs proved me wrong within 2 hours of trying out the latest CVS version of the XFT branch. Apologies to the developers for the previous post - it seems to run fine, and I can even select the fonts from my Xresources file like I used to. And I must say - it looks great with truetype fonts and anti-aliasing.
|
|
||||||||||||