|| ||Alan Cox <alan-AT-lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>|
|| ||"Pekka Enberg" <penberg-AT-cs.helsinki.fi>|
|| ||Re: [patch 07/10] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation|
|| ||Thu, 10 May 2007 14:04:52 +0100|
|| ||"Christoph Hellwig" <hch-AT-infradead.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers-AT-polymtl.ca>,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:52:26 +0300
"Pekka Enberg" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Alan Cox <email@example.com> wrote:
> > "blobs of crap" - in whose opinion. Yours. So you don't want the kernel
> > to mention things you personally don't approve of. Thats straight forward
> > censorship and has no place in free software.
> Out of kernel code comes and goes, so why mention it in-tree? Besides,
> what's wrong with the suggested "can be used for tracing or
> performance accounting?"
Because people want to know what it is really for ? It's quite amazing
really at the same time as people are posting crypto keys everywhere in
defiance of USSA law, we've got free software people trying to remove
references to a piece of out of tree software, and one that is free
And as I keep saying the tree is full of references to out of tree stuff.
The documentation directory alone currently contains over a thousand http
URLS as of 2.6.21-rc6-mm1.
to post comments)