LWN.net Logo

Sun has been known to feed the occasional troll, though.

Sun has been known to feed the occasional troll, though.

Posted May 16, 2007 5:50 UTC (Wed) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
In reply to: Schwartz: Free advice for the litigious by allesfresser
Parent article: Schwartz: Free advice for the litigious

Who joined Microsoft in bankrolling SCO? (and why didn't HP or any other Unix vendor see the need to "buy a SCOSource license"?)


(Log in to post comments)

Sun has been known to feed the occasional troll, though.

Posted May 17, 2007 4:21 UTC (Thu) by vmlinuz (subscriber, #24) [Link]

Well... I can't comment on the reported share deal mentioned in the article, but I can say for a fact, from personal experience, that the source code licensing was a genuine licensing of code which was then used in Solaris x86 development. It's important to remember, sometimes, that before Caldera bought most of SCO and became TSG, SCO was an honest software company, with some genuinely valuable code and technical expertise. We may not have been the biggest friends of Linux in those days, but as a company, our main focus was Unix-on-x86, so it was direct competition rather than the later nasty legal stuff.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds