| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
PJ has a pointPJ has a pointPosted May 14, 2007 13:23 UTC (Mon) by vblum (guest, #1151)In reply to: Microsoft takes on the free world (CNN) by NigelK Parent article: Microsoft takes on the free world (CNN)
Substantial non-infringing use has to be proven somewhere, whether questioned in the suit or not. Napster et al could not credibly demonstrate this, I believe.
YouTube is also plain competition for the established entertainment networks. If they can taint YouTube's reputation to the point of it going away, they will do it. Now or later.
(Says one who has decidedly not participated in any such filesharing to this day, no time for that)
(Log in to post comments)
PJ has a strawman Posted May 14, 2007 13:58 UTC (Mon) by NigelK (guest, #42083) [Link] Proving substantial non-infringing use is a slam-dunk here. It's the substantial infringing use that Google has to worry about.
PJ has a strawman Posted May 14, 2007 14:08 UTC (Mon) by vblum (guest, #1151) [Link] I respectfully submit that I am not a strawman. If you wish to stir trouble, please find another forum.
|
|
||||||||||||