Not a release cycle length problem
Posted May 3, 2007 18:12 UTC (Thu) by giraffedata
In reply to: Not a release cycle length problem
Parent article: A tale of two release cycles
As it's mildly hard to get developers into QC, the company makes working in the QC process an unofficial prerequisite to becoming a member of the kernel team
Sometimes, a company just makes QC work an official prerequisite of collecting one's paycheck; i.e. it hires testers for whatever they cost.
The reason the Linux kernel can't use this well-worn strategy for eliminating bugs is that the special economics of open source and community development don't provide a way to get people to do all that boring alpha testing (testing for the sake of testing) and debugging.
So we've been experimenting for years with release cycle lengths, bug tracking systems, etc. to try to find another way.
to post comments)