| |||||||||||||
GDB AlternativesGDB AlternativesPosted May 3, 2007 8:42 UTC (Thu) by alex (subscriber, #1355)In reply to: an intermediate example by bkoz Parent article: A tale of two release cycles
Much as I love my GDB command line I can't help but think it's one of those core apps that could do with a step back and re-write. I've looked at the code a few times and it's not pretty which I think makes it a huge learning curve for any wanabe hacker.
Of course it would require some people to actually start that effort. Have you seen any alternatives to GDB? Could this be an area where the monoculture stiffles true innovation in development?
(Log in to post comments)
GDB Alternatives Posted May 3, 2007 9:19 UTC (Thu) by scottt (subscriber, #5028) [Link] There is frysk: http://sourceware.org/frysk/If don't mind debugging your C++ program with a debugger written in Java.
GDB Alternatives Posted May 3, 2007 11:08 UTC (Thu) by mtk77 (guest, #6040) [Link] I am worried about frysk. It seems that the answer to all problems with gdb is "frysk will make gdb obsolete" but the look like they solve completely different problems.
I'm sure it's not deliberate, but it seems that the almost Microsoft-esque tactic of preannouncing something has the same effect - of putting off potential competitors.
There is no good reason that free software cannot produce something of the quality of the wonderful proprietary debugger TotalView but no work is being done in that direction.
GDB Alternatives Posted May 4, 2007 4:27 UTC (Fri) by mitchskin (subscriber, #32405) [Link] Robert O'Callahan (of Mozilla) isn't rewriting gdb, but he's working on an execution recorder that provides enough data for a debugger to reconstruct an entire program execution run down to the instruction level.
|
|||||||||||||