Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
The embedded Linux nightmare - an epilogueThe embedded Linux nightmare - an epiloguePosted May 3, 2007 4:19 UTC (Thu) by roelofs (guest, #2599)In reply to: The embedded Linux nightmare - an epilogue by bene42 Parent article: The embedded Linux nightmare - an epilogue But we have to show the "kernel" way is the cheapest way. Oh, I get that, and I'm grateful for articles like this one and its predecessor--it should be an excellent tool to help embedded engineers (who are often favorably inclined toward FLOSS in the first place) convince their management chains to work in a more community-compatible way. I was just pointing out that one of Thomas's arguments was maybe not quite as strong as it might appear at first glance; sometimes there are good reasons for sticking with an older kernel for an extended period. Also note that not all architectures get as much developer attention as i386 and x86_64, nor are they all as unified. Greg
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||