LWN.net Logo

Reasons to ignore bugs

Reasons to ignore bugs

Posted May 2, 2007 18:49 UTC (Wed) by tuxchick (guest, #42009)
In reply to: Reasons to ignore bugs by zlynx
Parent article: Job opening: kernel bug manager

OK, I can understand those reasons. But none of them apply to the OP's
comments. What's the point of doing anything if you never want to progress
beyond a rough first draft? 'Dare to be shoddy'??


(Log in to post comments)

Reasons to ignore bugs

Posted May 3, 2007 8:25 UTC (Thu) by dark (✭ supporter ✭, #8483) [Link]

Well, people enjoy different aspects of programming. For you it's probably the satisfaction of making something that works well. For xma it might be the thrill of tackling hard problems, with a corresponding lack of interest in polishing the solutions afterward. Or it might just be the joy of making things that move.

I happen to enjoy tracking down and fixing bugs, but on the other hand, when I write new code I go very slowly because I want to make sure it's perfect. I'd probably work well in a team with xma :)

To people who are in it for the hard problems, I'd say that bugs are a sign that you didn't get the solution exactly right, and sometimes the 100% solution is ten times as hard as the 99% solution. As an example, you can see that clearly in the efforts to make a kernel scheduler that works well in all cases.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds