| |||||||||||||
rbtree is per-CPUrbtree is per-CPUPosted Apr 19, 2007 6:18 UTC (Thu) by axboe (subscriber, #904)In reply to: *Ouch*. by smurf Parent article: Schedulers: the plot thickens
Hi,
The rbtree task timeline is per CPU, it's not a global entity. The latter would naturally never fly.
(Log in to post comments)
rbtree is per-CPU Posted Apr 19, 2007 6:28 UTC (Thu) by kwchen (subscriber, #13445) [Link] Has anyone experimented with one scheduling entity per numa-node, or one per physical CPU package etc, instead of current one per CPU?
rbtree is per-CPU Posted Apr 19, 2007 6:47 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link] Gah. Forgive my sloppy use of language. By "single RB tree" I meant "a single tree to replace the former run queues structure", not "a single tree on the whole system". Process migration between CPUs is, after all, not going to go away.
On another front, despite Con being rather miffed by Ingo's original patch, the subsequent dialog between them is a model of mutual respect that lots of people can learn from. Myself included.
|
|||||||||||||