| |||||||||||||
Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days!Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days!Posted Apr 15, 2007 12:28 UTC (Sun) by hlovdal (guest, #44671)In reply to: Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days! by terminator Parent article: A second remote hole for OpenBSD In fact, M$ can claim "No single remote hole in the default install of DOS, in lifetime!" But this is completely pointless considering the functionality of DOS without networking. Someone made a comparision between CP/M and Windows NT some years ago, declaring CP/M to be vastly more secure than Windows NT :)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||