| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Fedora free?Fedora free?Posted Apr 14, 2007 11:48 UTC (Sat) by cortana (subscriber, #24596)In reply to: Fedora free? by rahulsundaram Parent article: Blaming Fedora
Now that is interesting! I wonder what, then, is the reason that the FSF will not endorse Debian in this day and age!
(Log in to post comments)
Fedora free? Posted Apr 14, 2007 18:26 UTC (Sat) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Debian hosts and supports a non-free repository while technically unofficial is part of Debian infrastructure and is maintained by Debian developers. FSF wants that to be separated out entirely and wants Debian to not promote and mention it anywhere.
That is my understanding of the conflict. While non-free firmware in the kernel is problematic RMS says he is willing to overlook for a limited time period as a practical compromise.
Fedora free? Posted Apr 24, 2007 8:12 UTC (Tue) by robbe (subscriber, #16131) [Link] > FSF wants that to be separated out entirely and wants Debian to not> promote and mention it anywhere.
Which would be ... interesting with a lot of GNU manuals now being in
Like another poster said, there are quite a few different definitions
|
|
||||||||||||