| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Gaim becomes PidginGaim becomes PidginPosted Apr 9, 2007 3:01 UTC (Mon) by hp (subscriber, #5220)In reply to: Gaim becomes Pidgin by tetromino Parent article: Gaim becomes Pidgin
While IANAL, I'm pretty sure trademarks can be trademarks purely due to usage, even without registration. Wikipedia INAL either, but see
Not saying anything either way about the merits of AOL's case in general, just saying that the trademark registration date may not mean very much.
(Log in to post comments)
Gaim becomes Pidgin Posted Apr 9, 2007 12:20 UTC (Mon) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link] This may be so, but the AOL Lawyers "accepted" the name "gaim" as avoiding their trademark "AOL Instant Messenger". So in some sense AOL tacitly accepted an in-use mark which conflicted with one they later registered. It's possible this is not a strong legal argument, but to me it's bad faith.
And certainly when you look at the AOL lawyer brigade practices over the years, I see a whole bunch of deplorable activity. (offtopic:) It saddens me that in order to get acceptable treatment, these humans (developers) had to create a corporation. Normal people, real humans, seemingly cannot get justice in our system.
|
|
||||||||||||