Weekly Edition
Return to the Press page
| |||||||||||||
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal)
Glyn Moody looks at
Dell and Linux. "One of the core problems for open source has always
been that as a radical force outside the mainstream it is hard for its
supporters to influence conventional players there. In part, this was what
made Dell's Ideastorm so important: it gave a voice to those hitherto
unable to communicate usefully with the company. The effects have been
dramatic, with Dell now promising to sell systems with pre-installed
GNU/Linux. The question then must be, how can we build on that success to
achieve maximum impact?"
(Log in to post comments)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 18:20 UTC (Tue) by leomilano (guest, #32220) [Link] I think the next thing to do is vote with our wallets. If you buy a system from DELL, buy it with Linux pre-installed. (of course there are more linux-friendly vendors, like aslab, system76, etc)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:19 UTC (Tue) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] I still think that we should buy from companies that really "get it" like System76 ( http://www.system76.com ) rather than send money to a company that we crawled to, begging for Linux options, for years.
Buying from Dell's competitors, and helping them grow, is possibly more effective than sending money to Dell.
And it is a lot more satisfying, IMO.
-Steve
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:34 UTC (Tue) by ofeeley (guest, #36105) [Link] System76 seem to only offer nVidia's cards with their Ratel systems
128 MB nVidia GeForce 6200LE PCI-Express x16
That doesn't seem like "getting it" when they could be building the systems with Intel motherboards with actual Free/Open drivers provided courtesy of Intel, as opposed to nVidia's disdain [1] for Free/Open drivers.
Yes, it's great that the nouveau people are working hard on getting those cards reverse-engineered, but in the context of urging us to vote with our wallets I'd rather buy a DELL system that uses the Intel X3000 GMA integrated graphics chip. Intel appear to be getting it, so lets reward them.
1. Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:36 UTC (Tue) by ofeeley (guest, #36105) [Link] "It's so hard to write a graphics driver that opensourcing it would not help [...] In addition, customers aren't asking for opensource drivers." Andrew Fear, Nvidia software product manager http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/~marchesin/nvdri/fosdem2.pdf
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:41 UTC (Tue) by pizza (subscriber, #46) [Link] Unless, of course, the Intel X3000 GMA is inadequate for your needs, if it is even available given your other requirements (eg higher-end motherboards or non-intel processors, or perhaps your software needs something considerably better!)
System76 "gets it" -- they sell the system configuration(s) their customers demand. It's as simple as that.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:54 UTC (Tue) by tjc (subscriber, #137) [Link] System76 "gets it" -- they sell the system configuration(s) their customers demand. It's as simple as that.Dell does the same, and they are obviously selling more systems than System76, so I don't think this is a very compelling argument. If Dell starts selling notebooks with Intel hardware and Linux preinstalled at a reasonable price, that's probably enough to steer me away from a MacBook.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 19:59 UTC (Tue) by bfields (subscriber, #19510) [Link] Unless, of course, the Intel X3000 GMA is inadequate for your needs, if it is even available given your other requirements (eg higher-end motherboards or non-intel processors, or perhaps your software needs something considerably better!) Sure. But I'm surprised a "linux-friendly" vendor couldn't at least:
System76 "gets it" -- they sell the system configuration(s) their customers demand. It's as simple as that. Could be. I don't know what their customers demand. I only know why I haven't bought anything from them yet: the main reason for me to buy from a "linux-friendly" vendor is to save myself the trouble of having to research all the components for driver support. But since they silently include hardware requiring proprietary drivers, I still have to do all that work when I buy from them, so they don't offer me any particular advantage.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 21:34 UTC (Tue) by ofeeley (guest, #36105) [Link] Well, obviously that's true, but it doesn't reduce the central point which is that System76 are basing their systems on GPUs from a company that is incapable of releasing specs to e.g. the nouveau developers.
I'm looking at the whole thing from the very biased perspective of someone that wants to buy a replacement c.$1000 home desktop. I don't need amazing graphics capabilities (although I would like the GPU to be as fast as possible) and only care about the driver being solidly supported by Xorg. Right now that means an Intel G965 Express chipset:
Given that this can also take Core2Duo E63000 (which is also a selling point) I'd buy a system that was based on that and didn't try to bundle some horrible ATI/nVidia card that I will spend days trying to fix every time I update the kernel. As it happends DELL (at least in Canada) don't offer that combination: I can get a system like that but it comes bundled with either nVidia or ATi. Guess I'll have to just build my own again.
Although I'm not impressed with System76 (exactly because they don't appear to get it and continue providing dodgy hardware) I'm not impressed with DELL either.
If DELL actually come out and provide systems with clearly specificed motherboards (so that I can research and make sure there are no issues) and allow me to choose whether or not to buy an addon PCI-Express video card (should I have the need to dispaly weather simulations in real time) then I'm all for it. Ditto for System76.
If all they're doing is tailoring a particular kernel-version with particular drivrers and calling it "Installed linux" then I have no interest. I want a system that updates stably and with supported, open, Free drivers. Just because someone got it to work long enough to sell it to me isn't enough.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 15:29 UTC (Wed) by pizza (subscriber, #46) [Link] >I'm looking at the whole thing from the very biased perspective of someone that wants to buy a replacement c.$1000 home desktop. I don't need amazing graphics capabilities (although I would like the GPU to be as fast as possible) and only care about the driver being solidly supported by Xorg. Right now that means an Intel G965 Express chipset:
You could slap a Radeon X300/700/8x0-series card into your desktop and get vastly superior performance than the Intel G965, not even taking into account the performance penalty of the shared-memory approach of the G965. Using only Free Software.
(I have several machines where I put an old PCI graphics card simply because the performance hit from the shared memory graphics adapter was noticable. It's why server-class boards use very low-end discrete graphics (eg ATI's Rage XL) instead of shared memory arrangements)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 16:59 UTC (Wed) by ofeeley (guest, #36105) [Link] Do you have practical experience with the G965 Express chipsets showing a heavy hit on CPU performance? Intel's own bumf about this generation of integrated graphics chips (X3000) and the wikipedia entry I cited above claim that many of those problems from earlier chipsets have been mitigated. I'm very interested to know if you have observed these problems specifically with this latest chipset?
ps. As an aside, looking at the rantings on Intel's forums from people that see what AIGLX can do with these chips while Vista can't is interesting
pps. It seems that Dell's 22" LCD displays won't support 1680x1050 with the X3000 from other threads on those forums (it seems to be WinXP users complaining about that, but someone else mentioned it was a problem for XOrg7.1 too)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 5, 2007 21:45 UTC (Thu) by kamil (subscriber, #3802) [Link] Regarding 1680x1050, all I can say is that it works with GMA950 (945GM) and Dell 20" LCD (2007WFP). I even got it to work with an old first-generation Centrino 855GM. So it's hard to imagine that it wouldn't work with the latest chipset, though I haven't read any of those forums you mentioned.
You do need the new "modesetting" XOrg driver to get it working, though.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 22:23 UTC (Tue) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] So use the "nv" driver. It's not like the cards are unsupported for the things we really need.
Aside from silly OpenGL screensavers and TuxRacer, what need do we have for 3D?
Once you move into the areas of proprietary games or graphics workstations apps, what difference does using a proprietary graphics driver really make?
And Nouveau *is* on the way.
You can buy from Dell if you want. But after Microsoft drops by to slap their wrists and they withdraw support (and they will), I'm going to be back to say "I told you so". ;-)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 0:47 UTC (Wed) by zlynx (subscriber, #2285) [Link] The "nv" driver sucks. It sucks hard.
X CPU goes to 100% on a 2.2GHz cpu for whole seconds while I swap virtual desktops.
I'm using it anyway so I can play with -mm kernels but the nvidia driver and Compiz is sooo much better.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 17:24 UTC (Wed) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] Really? I have a 6800GT, and I cannot tell the difference between the free driver and the proprietary one in 2D.
Switching virtual desktops is essentially instantaneous for me.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 18:00 UTC (Wed) by zlynx (subscriber, #2285) [Link] I use a laptop. It could be the amount of time it takes the CPU to scale up from 800 to 2200. Or it could be that with 1920x1200, 24-bit screen and sub-pixel anti-aliased text, it just takes that long to redraw.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 21:41 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] It's a old machine with 1.13ghz thunderbird proccessor and a PCI Geforce 440mx video card.
Something that would have a significant impact on that machine would often not be noticable on your machine. It's just so fast that your not going to notice.
:)
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 1:11 UTC (Wed) by Mithrandir (subscriber, #3031) [Link] We only ship to within the United States and Canada.*cry*
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 19:53 UTC (Wed) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] Yeah. That sucks. They are working on correcting that. But no ETA yet.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 7:43 UTC (Wed) by NightMonkey (subscriber, #23051) [Link] Penguin Computing. "Getting it" (for Servers and Workstations) since 1998. That makes them 9 years ahead of Dell at making servers and workstations (and clusters) made to fit with Linux.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 16:02 UTC (Wed) by bfields (subscriber, #19510) [Link] Like the others, they don't include any mention of whether the hardware they sell is supported by free/open source drivers.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 20:02 UTC (Wed) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] Ask in the forum. It's the "System76 Support" area on this page:
The System76 support staff are very active there, and you should get answers fairly quickly.
I believe that *all* their machines are supported with free drivers. Although some people seem not to like the "nv" video driver. ;-) You should be fine with any of the units that feature Intel video and wifi, though.
But ask in the support forum first, to be sure. I could be wrong.
And make a suggestion about making the information available on their site. They seem quite open to taking suggestions.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 20:57 UTC (Tue) by docwhat (subscriber, #40373) [Link] But I don't *like* the Dell hardware. It's cheap feeling and the power supplies suck hard and they "key" all the hardware so it only works with Dell hardware.
I don't understand why this is a big deal; Dell just discovered one of the many ways that it isn't satisfying their customers.
Ciao!
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 21:18 UTC (Tue) by bfields (subscriber, #19510) [Link] they "key" all the hardware so it only works with Dell hardware. They do? What's an example?
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 15:43 UTC (Wed) by lj (guest, #376) [Link] I think the OP overstated this, but I will say that Dell uses non-ATX power supplies and motherboards in their systems. For example, I'm wrestling with this right now with two older PowerEdge 400SC systems with failing power supplies. I can either buy another Dell PS or I can go to PC Power and Cooling to get a Silencer 410 for about $120.
If the 400SC could accomodate a standard ATX power supply, I could go with a Seasonic 330 (which would be a nice improvement over the stock noisy Dell 250) for $60 from Newegg.
Same basic problem with the mobo- not standard ATX so my options for replacing the P4/i875-based board are limited.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 22:41 UTC (Tue) by mtaht (✭ supporter ✭, #11087) [Link] Maybe it's time to resurrect the old "Buy American" or "Buy Union" sort of signs, replacing the final word with "Buy Open".
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 18:39 UTC (Tue) by wlach (subscriber, #23397) [Link] "It might mean replacing an ageing PC with a new Dell machine rather than upgrading the motherboard and adding more memory."Isn't it a bit callous to be encouraging the generation of yet more e-waste in this day and age? I love Dell as much as the next guy, but I think I'll save my pennies for a few nice meals at my local restaurant or something.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 3, 2007 21:01 UTC (Tue) by i3839 (guest, #31386) [Link] Newer hardware is more power efficient than old one (if you don't gofor the raw performance tuned, insanely expensive "top of the line" hardware). Same for TFT versus CRT.
As for the waste generated: It depends on how often you buy new hardware,
Of course, the above rationale won't give you a warm and fuzzy feeling,
(All that said, I find it strange that people update their hardware so
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 13:45 UTC (Wed) by wlach (subscriber, #23397) [Link] Aside from the fact that most garbage isn't nearly as toxic or difficult to dispose of as e-waste, I pretty much agree with your assessment. I still maintain that it's pretty silly to ask people to buy stuff they don't need for "Linux's sake".
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 3:54 UTC (Wed) by jimmybgood (guest, #26142) [Link] Did I miss something? I'd heard gossip about Dell selling computers with Linux, but I didn't think anyone took it seriously. Are they actually doing it?
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 6:21 UTC (Wed) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link] You missed the second link in the first paragraph of the article. More specifically, this part:Dell has heard you and we will expand our Linux support beyond our existing servers and Precision workstation line. Our first step in this effort is offering Linux pre-installed on select desktop and notebook systems. We will provide an update in the coming weeks that includes detailed information on which systems we will offer, our testing and certification efforts, and the Linux distribution(s) that will be available. The countdown begins today.
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 11:42 UTC (Wed) by psb154 (guest, #43870) [Link] A school teacher of mine, when I was about nine (thirty four yearsago) spoke to my class about "commercialism". He said: In his day, thousands of Elvis Presley fans bought second hand leather jackets and some studs and then riveted the studs to the back of their leather jacket to spell the word: Elvis
Some people were a little more imaginative and did some very cool
However, it wasn't long before leather jackets with studs, spelling
That, my teacher said, was commercialism.
These days, I build my own computers from second hand (and new) parts
Being able to install three or four different flavors of the latest
These computers work well. My development computer displays on three
Once Linux becomes encapsulated inside commercially build computers,
I doubt it.
Linux does not exist to give Sun, Apple or Microsoft a bloody
If an open source project can not survive without commercial
Buy! Buy! Buy! - into Openness (Linux Journal) Posted Apr 4, 2007 21:52 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] Wow, you don't like commercialism to much, eh?
PCs used to be 4-5 thousand dollars, easy.
Nowadays I can go to Dell's outlet site and purchase effectively brand new computer for under 300 dollars that is several magnitudes more powerfull, more stable, and more usefull, then those computers that used to sell for 7-8 thousand dollars.
All thanks to commercialism/capitalist tendancies.
I can go further.. global communications, internet, etc. etc.
To me, the best thing it world for anybody to be doing software development-wise is to being paid to work on Free software. How is this a bad thing?
|
|||||||||||||