still seems to contain egregious (but relatively harmless) silliness
Posted Apr 1, 2007 20:31 UTC (Sun) by
jschrod (subscriber, #1646)
In reply to:
still seems to contain egregious (but relatively harmless) silliness by njs
Parent article:
SIL Open Font License revised (Linux.com)
> Another hard-won lesson is that trying to express intent and moral suasion in the legal text of a license is a really bad idea; let the license proper concentrate on defining what happens when lawsuits pop up, and put information about intent in clear English (e.g., in a Preamble that must always be included with the license itself).
You mean, like, in GPL v3?
</me ducks and looks for cover>
:-) Joachim
(
Log in to post comments)