| |||||||||||||
Working with raw images on LinuxWorking with raw images on LinuxPosted Mar 29, 2007 20:25 UTC (Thu) by leoc (subscriber, #39773)In reply to: Working with raw images on Linux by nix Parent article: Working with raw images on Linux
Especially considering that the image file is NOT owned by the company that sold the camera, but by the person taking the picture, so why do they think they have a right to deny the photographer access to the data?
It seems to me that the lack of interest that the general public has shown about the increasing problems around intellectual property has emboldened corporations to push even further into claiming ownership of things that people have usually taken for granted. Sooner or later people will wake up to this, and there will be reckoning.
(Log in to post comments)
Working with raw images on Linux Posted Mar 29, 2007 20:34 UTC (Thu) by vondo (guest, #256) [Link] From what I understand in the Nikon situation they are contemplating (or trying) to deny the user access to the white balance data, not the actual sensor data. I guess Nikon could try to argue that those correction curves are their proprietary property.
Just another reason to buy Canon. :-)
Many manufacturers obfuscate their RAW data, including Canon. Posted Apr 2, 2007 21:33 UTC (Mon) by pizza (subscriber, #46) [Link] To quote Dave Coffin (of dcraw fame)"
A firestorm of controversy recently erupted when Thomas Knoll of Adobe accused Nikon of encrypting the white balance data in the D2X and D2Hs cameras, thus preventing Adobe from fully supporting these cameras.
Working with raw images on Linux Posted Dec 10, 2007 18:56 UTC (Mon) by moxfyre (subscriber, #13847) [Link] Just another reason to buy Canon. :-)... Or Pentax, which actually has adopted the Adobe DNG standard raw image format, for its latest K10D digital SLR! Dave Coffin, author of dcraw, has high regard for DNG as a standard format: interview
|
|||||||||||||