| |||||||||||||
Pick best-known of the two namesPick best-known of the two namesPosted Mar 29, 2007 14:37 UTC (Thu) by dank (guest, #1865)Parent article: Beryl and Compiz: back together again?
At the moment, Beryl is much better known. The
(Log in to post comments)
Pick best-known of the two names Posted Mar 31, 2007 9:54 UTC (Sat) by erwbgy (subscriber, #4104) [Link] Really? I hadn't heard of Beryl until I read this article, but I hadheard of Compiz.
Calling the core Compiz and the plugins Beryl, as suggested above, sounds
Pick best-known of the two names Posted Mar 31, 2007 17:18 UTC (Sat) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] Why not call the core "core" and the plugins "plugins"?
That just sounds like needless jargon to me.
Pick best-known of the two names Posted Apr 2, 2007 19:36 UTC (Mon) by holstein (subscriber, #6122) [Link] The words "core" or "plugins" could be found hard to defend as brand names.
Pick best-known of the two names Posted Apr 2, 2007 20:56 UTC (Mon) by bronson (subscriber, #4806) [Link] Why would you want to use brand names for the subcomponents of a project? That would be like calling kernel/drivers "Alchemy," or /usr/share/doc "Brontosaurus." Yes, they're much more trademarkable, but does that really help anything?
|
|||||||||||||