| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
A new GPLv3 timetableA new GPLv3 timetablePosted Mar 28, 2007 21:28 UTC (Wed) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)In reply to: A new GPLv3 timetable by njs Parent article: A new GPLv3 timetable
Hm, I wasn't aware of the issues with the DRM section, or with the transparent and opaque sections. I only ever heard about the objections to invariant sections, front covers, and back covers.
That said, I think the new draft SFDL is a better idea, since it doesn't include invariants, front covers, or back covers. I still think FSF could distribute the Manifesto and the license texts as separate, aggregated works.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||