Sponsored link
Vyatta –
Linux & Open Source
Alternative to Cisco –
Advanced Routing,
Firewall, VPN, QoS..
Free Download ->
| |||||||||||
professionalsprofessionalsPosted Mar 18, 2007 20:19 UTC (Sun) by ekj (subscriber, #1524)In reply to: professionals by qu1j0t3 Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to HDR with Linux There's a reason why highlights are blown out. Sure. Because film and CMOS-censors share a weakness: they are incapable of capturing a high dynamic range. Your eye can easily look at the face of your loved one, standing in a shadowed room, infront of a beautiful sunlit panorama, and enjoy the entire scene. No camera, film or digital, can capture details *both* in the shadowed face of a person *and* on the sunligth snow-covered mountains outside. So yes, there's a reason. What is your solution ?
(Log in to post comments)
professionals Posted Apr 7, 2007 2:59 UTC (Sat) by ringerc (guest, #3071) [Link] In my view the real solution goes way beyond sensors.
We need devices that can display decent dynamic range, and wider adoption of file formats with more colour representation that's a better match for human vision (eg exponential colour). Without that, we're going to have a very hard time producing, working with, and displaying true HDR (as opposed to flattened-to-low-DR like in the article) images.
|
|||||||||||