| |||||||||||||
Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days!Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days!Posted Mar 15, 2007 16:13 UTC (Thu) by terminator (guest, #2292)Parent article: A second remote hole for OpenBSD
I tend to think OpenBSD's claim as the subject states. In fact, M$ can claim "No single remote hole in the default install of DOS, in lifetime!" But this is completely pointless considering the functionality of DOS without networking. So is the same for OpenBSD in some sense.
(Log in to post comments)
Only one remote holes in the default install, in more than 3 days! Posted Apr 15, 2007 12:28 UTC (Sun) by hlovdal (guest, #44671) [Link] In fact, M$ can claim "No single remote hole in the default install of DOS, in lifetime!" But this is completely pointless considering the functionality of DOS without networking.Someone made a comparision between CP/M and Windows NT some years ago, declaring CP/M to be vastly more secure than Windows NT :)
|
|||||||||||||