The Grumpy Editor's guide to HDR with Linux
Posted Mar 14, 2007 18:41 UTC (Wed) by k8to
Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's guide to HDR with Linux
It would be really useful if someone familiar with the various tools could comment on the tone mapping in psftmo versus other available tools. Even proprietary ones.
For example the default Adobe Photoshop tool seems to produce very fakey-looking (painting-like) results almost all the time, and not prone to creating "realistic photo" type images. Photomatix is much further in this direction with almost completely automated creation of completely silly results.
One semi-pro photographer I know (not a nonsense term, he is actively retained and paid for his work, sometimes) has developed a happy relationship with FDRtools, although I haven't grilled him on the details.
Personally I would like to know if recommending windows and mac based photographers look at psftools is a good idea.
to post comments)