Free Software Foundation courts hardware vendors (Linux-Watch)
Posted Mar 6, 2007 13:46 UTC (Tue) by
eru (subscriber, #2753)
In reply to:
Free Software Foundation courts hardware vendors (Linux-Watch) by khim
Parent article:
Free Software Foundation courts hardware vendors (Linux-Watch)
To see how the difference is minimal consider "optimized" firmware is DVD-ROM which sees DVD-Video disk and immediately switches to 1x speed (since you know, you don't need anything more for DVD-Video) and also refuses to work with DVDs from wrong region [...]
Yes, that is unpleasant and user-hostile, but same kinds of restrictions
can (and have been) implemented purely in hardware. (Example: consumer
camcorders sold in Europe usually lack a video input socket even when
similar models sold elsewhere have it, due to an
obsolete protectionist customs rule). I'm not sure what the
FSF can do here except educate people to boycot such crap devices. The
DVD-ROM makers are unlikely to ever support reprogramming the devices.
On the other hand, general-purpose computers are meant to be
reprogrammed, so it is important to ensure that stays fully possible.
And I think it is a more winnable fight.
And also it does not make it Ok to shove everything to separate device (load this 64MB blog with god-knows-what to our network card and you can use 10KB 100% free driver - happy now?).
Yes, if the network card works. It does not make much
difference if the 64Mb blob is in the device EPROM, or loaded into
the device by the OS at boot time, provided the blob is available
to all OS writers
and can be freely distributed with the OS.
(Obviously you would not want to use such a card in an embedded device,
but on modern desktops and servers 64Mb is peanuts).
(
Log in to post comments)