Posted Mar 6, 2007 0:24 UTC (Tue) by dark
In reply to: Bad Security
Parent article: Single Packet Authorization (Linux Journal)
You forgot option 3: bugs in the SPA server could allow execution of
From what I can see, it just adds more possibly-vulnerable code to an
already complex system. Is there a real benefit to having an SPA server at
udp/62201 instead of an SSH server at tcp/22?
to post comments)