| |||||||||||||
Some idle comments about Linus' e-mail response and LinuxSome idle comments about Linus' e-mail response and LinuxPosted Mar 2, 2007 2:04 UTC (Fri) by proski (subscriber, #104)In reply to: Some idle comments about Linus' e-mail response and Linux by nix Parent article: Quote of the week And here we see Linus himself suggesting almost the same thing. No, it's not that bad, since it's a valid pointer, but it's close enough :)
(Log in to post comments)
Some idle comments about Linus' e-mail response and Linux Posted Mar 3, 2007 2:08 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] The &bad_ctype is non-tasteless, I'd say. It's *transparent* and you caneasily tell what it's doing when you read the code. And it doesn't dump core if you dereference it :)
|
|||||||||||||