| |||||||||||||
Who wrote 2.6.20?Who wrote 2.6.20?Posted Feb 21, 2007 6:16 UTC (Wed) by dambacher (subscriber, #1710)Parent article: Who wrote 2.6.20?
Very interesting statistics that is!
(Log in to post comments)
Who wrote 2.6.20? Posted Feb 21, 2007 6:55 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link] It's probably mostly driver code for hardware they want to sell on servers or in embedded systems were it's worth their time to contribute.
I realy doubt that their position on 'ip' has changed any in regards to consumer grade stuff.
It may also be partly due to the fact that large corporations have decentralized management were the left hand may disagree entirely with the right, while in the meantime the left foot is quietly contributing code.
Who wrote 2.6.20? Posted Feb 21, 2007 9:52 UTC (Wed) by johill (subscriber, #25196) [Link] Broadcom appears to have quite separated internal groups so while for example the wired networking groups is doing tg3 and b44, bcm43xx is entirely a volunteer effort.
Who wrote 2.6.20? Posted Feb 21, 2007 11:49 UTC (Wed) by gouyou (subscriber, #30290) [Link] It also looks like they are making a significant part of the hardware for the OLPC project.
Who wrote 2.6.20? Posted Feb 21, 2007 14:35 UTC (Wed) by dwmw2 (subscriber, #2063) [Link] It also looks like they are making a significant part of the hardware for the OLPC project.Er, Broadcom? Not so.
Broadcom and Linux Posted Feb 22, 2007 15:02 UTC (Thu) by massimiliano (subscriber, #3048) [Link] This is not kernel related, but it is Linux related anyway... A Broadcom employee ported the Mono JIT to the MPIS architecture, because they needed it, and of course they were going to use it on Linux.
|
|||||||||||||