| |||||||||||||
Stupid question - that Linus anticipatedStupid question - that Linus anticipatedPosted Feb 20, 2007 0:28 UTC (Tue) by mikov (subscriber, #33179)In reply to: Stupid question - that Linus anticipated by ds2horner Parent article: Alternatives to fibrils
How could it _not_ matter to callers ? If the thread id can change arbitrarily based on factors outside of the applications control - e.g. if some driver buffer is empty - then the thread id becomes completely pointless.
To me this seems completely unacceptable. Am I missing something ?
(Log in to post comments)
Stupid question - that Linus anticipated Posted Feb 22, 2007 21:02 UTC (Thu) by huaz (guest, #10168) [Link] You are right, it's indeed unacceptable.
|
|||||||||||||