| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Recommendation: no GPLv3 for SolarisRecommendation: no GPLv3 for SolarisPosted Feb 11, 2007 2:17 UTC (Sun) by mmarq (guest, #2332)In reply to: Recommendation: no GPLv3 for Solaris by mmarq Parent article: Recommendation: no GPLv3 for Solaris
"" So in a GPLv3 there should be clearly *explicit* that any DRM protected system/sub-system will have a non-fee public key applyed for code in **any public acessable GPLv3 repository** ""
Should read
"" So in a GPLv3 there should be clearly *explicit* that any DRM protected system/sub-system will have whenever needed a non-fee public key applyable for binarys resulting from code in **any public acessable GPLv3 repository** ""
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||