Weekly Edition Return to the Front page |
Desktop Linux Summits and Consortiums[This article was contributed by Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier] Sometimes two stories in the media become inextricably linked. When one story is covered, the other issue is always mentioned -- creating an impression that there is a connection where the link is sometimes tenuous or non-existant.Such is the case with the Desktop Linux Summit and the Desktop Linux Consortium (DLC). The link, however, between the Summit and the DLC is thin at best and seems to be the victim of bad timing. With better timing, the DLC might be seen for what its founders want it to be: a meeting of the minds of companies and organizations who are interested in furthering Linux as a desktop operating system. Questions still remain as to exactly what happened with the Desktop Linux Summit. The event is promoted as a "multi-vendor" event about Linux on the desktop. However, many vendors have abandoned the summit after Bruce Perens was replaced as the keynote speaker by Michael Robertson -- not coincidentally the CEO and founder of Lindows.com. The original list of sponsors and exhibitors differs greatly from the current list. In fact, at least one organization listed as an exhibitor has asked to be withdrawn. Sam Hiser, of the OpenOffice.org Project confirmed today that the project has asked to be withdrawn from the list of exhibitors. However, they are still listed on the Summit website. A representative for Sun Microsystems also confirmed that they have asked to be removed as an exhibitor, but explained that it was because Sun's speaker would be unavailable for the conference -- not because Perens was no longer speaking. We spoke with Jill Ratkevic, who was the original coordinator for the Desktop Linux Summit. According to Ratkevic, Robertson and Lindows.com president Kevin Carmony were aware of the decision to have Perens do the keynote. However, Carmony claims that he "always" thought that Robertson would be the keynote speaker and that it was a "mix-up."
We'll take 100 percent responsibility for the miscommunication
early on... We haven't come out and told our side of the story, and
we really don't want to. We'd rather have everybody think ill of
Lindows and get on with business. Okay we're slimeballs, okay we
can take that as long as we get on with business. We don't want to
spend time on the debate.
Jeremy White, CEO of CodeWeavers, told us that no one had a problem with Robertson speaking -- only the manner in which the change was made. "I think that a lot of folks that were willing to be flexible on the agenda...what was frustrating was the manner in which it was done." According to Carmony, the event is still sold out, but it certainly has a different flavor now that many Linux companies have pulled out. Attendees listed for the "sold-out" conference now include such Linux-specific companies as Borders, NovaPCs and the Brobeck law firm. Shawn Gordon, of The Kompany, says he plans to remain involved:
I did pull out for a few days, for a different reason however, and
I'm back in it now... My interest is mostly in getting theKompany
as much exposure as possible to the main stream press and potential
users that haven't heard about us before, and this looked like the
best opportunity to do it, regardless of the speakers or program.
The Linux Professional Institute and SuSE will also remain involved. Holger Dyroff, head of SuSE's U.S. operations, said that he did not want to disappoint people who had already made appointments to speak with SuSE. However, by all accounts, the fuss over the summit is separate from the decision to form a Linux Desktop Consortium. Perens, who is serving as the interim executive director for the consortium, says that the LDC:
...is not a response to the summit issue, but I think that having
the Consortium run the next summit will result in some good
things... Lindows won't have to pay for everything, and we'll have
a better shot at a more even program.
White says that the discussions for the consortium began "more than a month ago." "A few of us got together and said, 'hey, we should do a Linux Desktop Consortium.' We felt that we could use a more unified voice, and it's time for a Linux desktop." White says that the consortium will focus on business users' needs, but "we definitely don't want to neglect grandma." The consortium is still in the planning stages right now. White says the group is "in a waiting period while we're gathering information." Despite the fact that a number of LDC members pulled out of the Summit, Lindows.com was still invited to join the LDC. Carmony says that Lindows.com is taking a wait-and-see attitude about the consortium, but that Lindows is "absolutely" open to the idea of joining the group if it turns out to be something they can get behind. Though the goals of the consortium are still somewhat vague, Perens said that they definitely plan to put on a vendor-neutral desktop conference. Group marketing initiatives also seem to be part of the plan. White says that the group wants to find a way that companies, projects and end-users can work together -- though the details haven't been ironed out yet. Member companies are being asked to pony up $1,000 for membership, but White says that the group doesn't plan to ask free software and open source projects for money. Some may wonder how successful the consortium will be, since many members are competing companies. However, Perens says that the consortium "won't have to do much to be successful... there are a number of things that the various players should be taking about. There are events that should be held that can be held fairly. We don't have to save the world." Holger Dyroff, head of SuSE Linux U.S. operations, says that SuSE doesn't plan to take the most active role in the organization but that SuSE is behind the idea of pooling marketing efforts and encouraging companies to see that their products integrate their products with Linux. With any luck, the bad blood over the Summit will fade in time and Linux vendors will be able to make Linux a real success on the desktop. Everyone we spoke to for this story indicated a desire to put the issue behind them and to work on making Linux a success rather than focusing on the negatives. (Log in to post comments)
The Keynote Posted Feb 6, 2003 3:00 UTC (Thu) by BrucePerens (subscriber, #2510) [Link] Most press mentions Michael replacing me as the keynote. That isn'treally what got anyone upset. Rather, it was Lindows.com acting unilaterally in changing the overall program - of which the keynote was one piece. I don't care much if I don't get the keynote, and I offered to recruit a well-known outsider in my place. A certain CEO was suggested who is not a Linux desktop software vendor, he would have been fine with me, and his name's Michael too :-) Bruce
|
Copyright © 2003, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds
Powered by Rackspace Managed Hosting.