| Weekly edition | Kernel | Security | Distributions | Search |
| Archives | Calendar | Subscribe | Write for LWN | LWN.net FAQ |
Re: Firefox
Re: Firefox
Posted Jan 26, 2007 9:51 UTC (Fri) by ldo (subscriber, #40946)In reply to: Re: Firefox by bronson
Parent article: lca2007: Christopher Blizzard
That's impossible! On my 64 bit system running 2.0.0.1 it only takes me about 1/2 day of browsing to hit 900 MB.
Do you have nspluginwrapper installed to enable the Adobe Flash plug-in? When I did, my Firefox would only run for a couple of days at a time before I started incurring major disk thrashing and slowness. Since I removed nspluginwrapper, Firefox has stayed up non-stop. At least 4 weeks, like I said.
Darn--there doesn't seem to be any easy way to get the exact date and time my Firefox process started--all ps is showing is "2006" ...
(Log in to post comments)
Re: Firefox
Posted Jan 26, 2007 17:03 UTC (Fri) by roelofs (subscriber, #2599) [Link]
Darn--there doesn't seem to be any easy way to get the exact date and time my Firefox process started--all ps is showing is "2006" ...Heh...I had the same problem initially, but I found you can use either -o bsdstart or -o start=WIDE-START-COLUMN to get the day and month, at least.
Greg
P.S. No Flash, no Java here.