| |||||||||||||
GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN)GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN)Posted Jan 26, 2007 1:09 UTC (Fri) by error27 (subscriber, #8346)In reply to: GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN) by sbergman27 Parent article: GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN)
I disagree with PJ about the GPLv3 and I think she's gone way over board on her anti Novell thing.
But still it's her own website and she can do whatever she wants with it. She's been up front that she deletes comments.
MoG destroyed her own career through her constant lying and hatefulness.
(Log in to post comments)
GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN) Posted Jan 26, 2007 1:54 UTC (Fri) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] """MoG destroyed her own career through her constant lying and hatefulness. """
I used to think as you do.
But now I wonder if Miss Jones is not cleverer than any of us realize.
The woman scares me. She is not what she seems.
And I find myself wondering... like Maureen did... just who *is* Pamela Jones?
GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN) Posted Jan 26, 2007 2:30 UTC (Fri) by b3timmons (guest, #40286) [Link] You sound a little obsessed. Didn't MoG stalk PJ or something? Perhaps you need to take a break from her.
PJ goes overboard once in a great while but always seems to be transparent in her arguments, unlike the usual entities that she comments upon.
I think it is really cool that she has been able to maintain her privacy -- good for her.
GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN) Posted Jan 26, 2007 2:40 UTC (Fri) by sbergman27 (guest, #10767) [Link] """You sound a little obsessed. """
No. I fell for Little Miss Innocent's "I can't stand profanity!" stance for years.
She goes overboard uncomfortably often.
And there is something very, very opaque about her.
Not obsessed. Just disenchanted and curious...
-Steve
GPL 3: An Open-Source Earthquake? (CRN) Posted Jan 26, 2007 8:19 UTC (Fri) by beoba (guest, #16942) [Link] Hooray speculative attacks on character!
So, GPL3?
|
|||||||||||||