LWN.net Logo

GPL3 will become dominant in all GNU/Linux distros

GPL3 will become dominant in all GNU/Linux distros

Posted Jan 17, 2007 14:36 UTC (Wed) by dwalters (subscriber, #4207)
In reply to: Sounds like FUD by Duncan
Parent article: Sun to release OpenSolaris under GPL version 3 (Linux-Watch)

First, let me say that if these rumours turn out to be true, and Open Solaris really does get released under the GPL3 (complete with its anti-DRM and anti-software patent clauses), I think this is an excellent move. Kudos to Sun.

I think it's important to remember that GNU/Linux distros are already a giant melting pot of all kinds of Free and Open Source software licenses (GPL2, MIT, Apache, BSD, etc. etc.). The GPL2-licensed kernel is just one software component.

It may be true that the Linux kernel will remain GPL2, but because so many essential parts of a functioning GNU/Linux distro will become licensed under the GPL3 over the coming year (and beyond), the GPL3 will, in my opinion, become the dominant license.

I don't think that a GPL3-licensed kernel gives Open Solaris a huge advantage over a predominantly GPL3-licensed GNU system contianing a GPL2-licensed Linux kernel. In fact, I think it will make hardly any difference at all.

On a slight tangent, I think that the fact that Sun will be throwing their weight behind GPL3 adds to the size of the GPL3 Tsunami that is about to hit the corporate software industry. The GPL3 will be unstoppable, and big companies such as Novell, HP, etc. will be forced to accept its "playing field-levelling" anti-software patent terms.

We could be in for a very interesting year ahead. I predict that the patent terms of the Novell-Microsoft agreement will be swept away by the GPL3 tidal wave as Microsoft is forced back to the negotiating table.


(Log in to post comments)

GPL3 will become dominant in all GNU/Linux distros

Posted Jan 17, 2007 16:07 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

Indeed. Even at its most extreme, a GPLed OpenSolaris kernel replacement would hardly be akin to the Unix->Windows or Windows->Linux takeovers: a few pieces of low-level-tangled userspace would need to be rewritten, probably the most nifty parts of Linux (e.g. udev) would gain reimplementations in OpenSolaris, and... hardly anything else would need to change at all. Users, developers, almost everyone would see things almost unchanged.

The free software ecology has already coped with changes almost on this scale with nary a ripple. After all, it's not the kernel software that matters, ultimately: it's the sum of all the software, and the free software developers, and they're not going to vanish. There's already a diversity of free kernels: one growing dominant over the others is just a change in degree, not in kind.

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds