Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)
Posted Jan 16, 2007 8:30 UTC (Tue) by
sean.hunter (guest, #7920)
Parent article:
Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)
This analogy is poor because there are all sorts of legitimate reasons to prevent people to access or alter healthcare data. If I wrote a GPL Electronic Health Record I would not necessarily think that it would automatically be bad for someone to make a device that contained my code but prevented people from modifying the data. In fact I would not want to prevent that use of my code at all.
Secondly the credibility of the central argument of this article is compromised by using Richard Stallman-invented terms such as "Tivoization". It would be far more persuasive if the author argued using real English and argued the question purely on its merits.
For my part, I am far from convinced of the need for a GPLv3, and neither the prosetylising of the FSF nor this article have persuaded me. If anything, they are making it less likely that I will ever adopt the GPLv3 or the "or any later version" clause for any free software I write.
The people who write free and open source software do not subscribe to a single world-view, and the FSF certainly doesn't speak for everyone.
(
Log in to post comments)