LWN.net Logo

Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)

Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)

Posted Jan 16, 2007 8:30 UTC (Tue) by sean.hunter (guest, #7920)
Parent article: Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)

This analogy is poor because there are all sorts of legitimate reasons to prevent people to access or alter healthcare data. If I wrote a GPL Electronic Health Record I would not necessarily think that it would automatically be bad for someone to make a device that contained my code but prevented people from modifying the data. In fact I would not want to prevent that use of my code at all.

Secondly the credibility of the central argument of this article is compromised by using Richard Stallman-invented terms such as "Tivoization". It would be far more persuasive if the author argued using real English and argued the question purely on its merits.

For my part, I am far from convinced of the need for a GPLv3, and neither the prosetylising of the FSF nor this article have persuaded me. If anything, they are making it less likely that I will ever adopt the GPLv3 or the "or any later version" clause for any free software I write.

The people who write free and open source software do not subscribe to a single world-view, and the FSF certainly doesn't speak for everyone.


(Log in to post comments)

Tivo Healthcare (Free Software Magazine)

Posted Jan 16, 2007 15:47 UTC (Tue) by zotz (guest, #26117) [Link]

"If I wrote a GPL Electronic Health Record I would not necessarily think that it would automatically be bad for someone to make a device that contained my code but prevented people from modifying the data. In fact I would not want to prevent that use of my code at all."

You probably should. If the device maker prevented the people who were supposed to be able to properly change the data from being able to do so. I think that is what is under discussion.

Of course it is fine to prevent people who are not supposed to change the data from changing it and to prevent data that is not supposed to be changed from being changed. The problem is with preventing people who are supposed to be able to change data that is supposed to be able to be changed from changing that data.

I would appreciate your further input.

all the best,

drew

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds