A cost analysis of Vista content protection (just a bit off topic)
Posted Dec 25, 2006 10:03 UTC (Mon) by hummassa
In reply to: A cost analysis of Vista content protection (just a bit off topic)
Parent article: A cost analysis of Vista content protection
>> ""If you choose to knowingly kill yourself - fine with me, but I want
>> you off any health insurance reimbursement system. Eat all the trans
>> fats and consume all the addictive drugs you please - try tobacco. But
>> don't cry later.""
> Fuck that. This sort of thing REALY pisses me off. I WORK for a living.
> I make a valueable contribution to sociaty and I get compinsated. I use
> the money I earn to buy health insurance.
I think the question here is (and I would like that you respond it with a
sound argument if you have one): I too work for a living, etc etc. WHY
should my health insurance cost the same as yours, if I do everything to
prevent health problems (including seriously limiting my intake of drugs,
amongst them white sugar, trans fat, alcohol and tobacco) and you don't???
You should be carrying the burden of your own style of living, not me.
> I am a grown person, work for a living, and it's not anybody else's
> business. It's NOT ANY OF YOUR BUSINESS.
The problem is: it IS my business if you are spending MY money on your
self-inflicted health problems.
to post comments)