Jeremy Allison Has Resigned from Novell to Protest MS Patent Deal (Groklaw)
Posted Dec 22, 2006 4:21 UTC (Fri) by
drag (subscriber, #31333)
Parent article:
Jeremy Allison Has Resigned from Novell to Protest MS Patent Deal (Groklaw)
Interesting quote here:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=170
"Unil the 29th, I'm really busy fixing some last issues for Novell, I don't want to leave them a product in bad shape."
First off.. It's a big mistake for Novell to do the patent thing with Microsoft. It's going to cost them. GPLv3 for them is going to be very ackward and if any other developers leave it's horrible for them. There is no need for the 'community' to 'punish' Novell any furthur. They are doing it to themselves.
It's a good agreement otherwise, this Microsoft Novell thing. For example OpenXML support in OO.org is a kick-ass move. Very business smart, very benificial for the community. Some governments may be adopting ODF for political reasons, but aside from that in the real world defacto standards truimph paper standards every single time. Nobody is going to stop using Office because it doesn't support ODF.
Also it's showing that Microsoft is now selling Linux to their customers. Sure they are doing is so that people running Novell services on Suse can run Suse in a Windows VM as people use Microsoft's tools to migrate away from Novell, but that's just how it goes.
(PS. if you want to 'punish' Novell the best possible way you can do it is to create a effective and easy to deploy open source-based network directory system to rival Active Directory and eDirectory... which the Free and Open Source world lacks completely. Beleive me, I've done secure LDAP and kerberos on Linux using open source software and it doesn't come close to what you can do with AD at the ease at which it integrates into Windows desktop. Not even close, not even to the AD that was released nearly 6 years ago with Windows 2000, much less the modern one.)
But I love that quote.
"Unil the 29th, I'm really busy fixing some last issues for Novell, I don't want to leave them a product in bad shape."
He worked for Novell, but he perceived SAMBA as a product he is selling to Novell. Since he didn't like what Novell was doing he was free to just get up and leave.
No anti-compete agreements. No NDA to interfer with his work. He still retains rights and ability to work on Samba at any company he wants.
This is a total turn around compared to what it seems that most professional programmers working in the industry does. In other big companies they are almost servents to the corporate board. How many developers working on Microsoft's SMB stuff can just get up with the source code and go work for Novell or Google or whatever just because they feel like it?
To me this shows the practical application of Freedom as granted to programmers under the GPL...
(
Log in to post comments)