|| ||Dave Jones <davej-AT-redhat.com>|
|| ||Re: F7 Plan (draft)|
|| ||Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:44:08 -0500|
|| ||Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-redhat.com>|
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:28:16AM -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Tim Burke wrote:
> > Things like Xen which are a major integration challenge make much more sense
> > in Fedora. There are installer, system startup, networking, yada, yada to
> > sort out. In contrast, realtime is primarily "just a kernel". So the same
> > integration challenges do not exist (knock on wood). There is already an
> > existing upstream community around the -rt patchset. Based on this, we may
> > not want to fragment the audience.
> > Mind you, I'm not trying to holdback RT from Fedora. I just don't think its
> > mainstreamed enough to fit responsibly. I welcome opinions though.
> There is increasing interest in the Fedora community re: offering multiple
> pre-built kernels -- with lots and lots of caveats. Perhaps the RT kernel
> is one of these.
Whilst Red Hat's medical coverage fully covers "mental health" issues,
I'd really rather not proceed down this avenue.
We can't support *one* kernel properly. On what planet does it make sense
to throw more variants in the mix ?
This whole idea stinks of doom so bad.
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
to post comments)