Kanotix seeks stability, sidux follows unstable
Posted Dec 15, 2006 8:05 UTC (Fri) by
codermattie (guest, #42239)
Parent article:
Kanotix seeks stability, sidux follows unstable
Debian is a great distribution, I ran it for years. In contexts where
risk is unacceptable it is a good choice still.
However for a developer or user who wishes to selectively track the upstream for both features and bugs the protracted stabalization on a branch model has been fraught with difficulty. The success of the 2.6 series in comparison to the previous 2.4 and 2.2 kernels is a good distro-agnostic example.
When using debian it is difficult to diverge from the distribution mainline without learning a complex package format/system. Forking debian unstable to stabilize and release as a new distribution is now classic. Without a better generalized solution for merging it will have the same problems
as debian, just with newer versions.
Merging technology is fundamental to the linux development model. Git
IMHO points towards a sane future. I can maintain my system kernel as
a private branch from a tag such as 2.6.19 and then pick single changes
that fix or improve the kernel without importing a large body of changes
where it is difficult to predict or analyze the effects and interaction of those changes.
It would be interesting to see a distro that was based on the git ideas.
Gentoo IMHO has moved the farthest towards flexible branching while integrating mainline updates.
(
Log in to post comments)