| |||||||||||||
Keeping current with SpamAssassin rulesKeeping current with SpamAssassin rulesPosted Dec 8, 2006 12:11 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Keeping current with SpamAssassin rules by NAR Parent article: Keeping current with SpamAssassin rules
Indeed, but people seem to have the assumption that spam scanners are 'sort of like virus scanners' and so can be updated safely. Because of the existence of plugins and eval rules (which are moved into plugins in 3.2.x), this is not true, but I can see why people might think it is.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||