LWN.net Logo

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 8, 2006 0:42 UTC (Fri) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
In reply to: Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet) by azhrei_fje
Parent article: Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Why on earth would Novell devote valuable engineer time to OpenXML? Hopefully they can put out another FAQ to explain just what it is they're thinking.


(Log in to post comments)

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 8, 2006 1:45 UTC (Fri) by njs (subscriber, #40338) [Link]

I'm not familiar with the details of this whole OpenXML thing,
and I know there's significant suspicion about Novell's aims
or judgement after their buddying up to MS, but... can someone
explain how this is different from spending time supporting
the existing .doc format? Getting .doc support into free
word processors took a long time, but it was a huge benefit,
because many people could not switch away from MS without an
something interoperable to switch to. If MS is switching to
OpenXML, we _have_ to follow at least far enough to have
import/export filters, no?

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 8, 2006 8:44 UTC (Fri) by HenrikH (guest, #31152) [Link]

Because we want to kill OpenXML before it goes mainstream? Supporting .doc was essential for people to even consider OOo, but now we want to push ODF instead of having to live with yet another .doc (OpenXML) format.

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 10, 2006 7:55 UTC (Sun) by eklitzke (subscriber, #36426) [Link]

Writing code to support OpenXML will do very little to help or hinder attempts so kill OpemXML. Frankly, I'd rather have the option of being able to view OpenXML documents soon after Word starts using them, because I am in a position where I will need to be able to open them.

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 8, 2006 12:54 UTC (Fri) by pointwood (subscriber, #2814) [Link]

My guess is that it is because OpenXML is going to be used quite a
bit whether we like it or not.

Microsoft's document gambit moves ahead (ZDNet)

Posted Dec 8, 2006 14:19 UTC (Fri) by boudewijn (subscriber, #14185) [Link]

About 150 man years of engineer time, according to Microsoft's Mac
business unit:
http://blogs.adobe.com/shebanation/2006/12/open_xml_one-w....

As
Thomas Zander, the KWord maintainer says in his blog
(http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2568), the familiarity of the
situation is awful: "What happens if the MS format becomes an official
standard? Then all office suites that want to support it will spent the
next years spending time writing and testing their import filters. That
may give you a familiar feeling since that's what many office software
has been forced to do for the last half a dozen years or so. Following
Microsoft instead of honest innovation."

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds