Recent Features
| |||||||||||||
Questions that need answeringQuestions that need answeringPosted Dec 7, 2006 10:56 UTC (Thu) by ronaldcole (guest, #1462)In reply to: Questions that need answering by nix Parent article: Of hypocrisy and the FSF (Libervis)
Of course, this assumes that the patents are valid *AND* that Linux source code actually infringes them *AND* that such infringement is willful as evidenced by not immediately removing the infringing code upon it's identification.
It's probably time for some of the famous Groklaw community to research Microsoft's patents and deFUD this situation to the point where Ballmer starts throwing office *DESKS*!
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||