Posted Jan 28, 2003 17:21 UTC (Tue) by jdthood (subscriber, #4157)
[Link]
Actually the file is a list of amendments to European patent law proposed by several different parties. The amendment proposals fall into two groups which we might label "left" and "right". On the left are proposals that would exclude computer processes from patentability --- restricting patents to inventions of physical devices and processes, emphasize the need for novelty for an invention to be patentable, and strengthen publishing requirements. This group includes amendments put forward by Rocard, Geneviève Fraisse, and Raina A. Mercedes Echerer. On the right are amendments proposed by Janelly Fourtou which would strengthen patent rights and explicitly *include* computer processes among patentable entities.
Fourtou gives some very clear justification for his amendments. There is TRIPS. There is the fact that the European Patent Office is already granting software patents, and the mandate of the Commission is not to change existing practice but to codify it. Fourtou argues that European law already allows software to be patented, and that it would be a bad idea to try to draw a new distinction between software (to become unpatentable) and programmed devices (patentable), since that would mean that there could be software that was legal to sell but illegal to sell packaged with hardware to run it on.
I have more thinking to do about all of this. Thanks for the link.