| |||||||||||||
KHB: Automating bug huntingKHB: Automating bug huntingPosted Nov 23, 2006 0:47 UTC (Thu) by bronson (subscriber, #4806)In reply to: KHB: Automating bug hunting by nix Parent article: KHB: Automating bug hunting
Does anybody even use ExpENSiv anymore? Their recovery tool requires running "-r check -f"... the dangers of idiotic license restrictions combined with command-line idioms. :)
(Log in to post comments)
ExpENSiv Posted Nov 26, 2006 20:32 UTC (Sun) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link] It would be nice if someone would say here what product it is, anyway. Just for fun, I looked at the paper and tried to google some of the words it uses in connection with the product, but came up dry. There are lots of LWN readers who don't have enough background in code control systems to figure it out.
ExpENSiv Posted Nov 27, 2006 5:06 UTC (Mon) by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330) [Link] Just Google "-r check -f".
ExpENSiv Posted Nov 29, 2006 3:10 UTC (Wed) by giraffedata (subscriber, #1954) [Link] BitKeeper, then.The quotes make a lot of difference in Googling.
ExpENSiv Posted Nov 28, 2006 22:29 UTC (Tue) by roelofs (guest, #2599) [Link] There are lots of LWN readers who don't have enough background in code control systems to figure it out.Apparently it's a proprietary revision-control product about which LWN readers heard a great deal, particularly in early 2005. ;-) Greg
|
|||||||||||||