| |||||||||||||
GPL survives antitrust challenge - againGPL survives antitrust challenge - againPosted Nov 16, 2006 1:58 UTC (Thu) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: GPL survives antitrust challenge - again by jstAusr Parent article: GPL survives antitrust challenge - again
> 2. The fact that there is no "allows requirement of "no charge"" in the GNU GPL. (The keyword there being "requirement".)
Just for your reference:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTh...
That's copyright royalty, right there - not permitted per GPL - not even for "distribution", not just "redistribution".
Of course, feel free to believe otherwise. ;-)
(Log in to post comments)
GPL survives antitrust challenge - again Posted Nov 16, 2006 17:33 UTC (Thu) by jstAusr (guest, #27224) [Link] That says:a fee can not be required *not* requires no fee.
GPL survives antitrust challenge - again Posted Nov 16, 2006 19:21 UTC (Thu) by bojan (subscriber, #14302) [Link] "Charity royalty" strikes again ;-)
|
|||||||||||||