| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Daniel Wallace lost this argument over TWO years agoDaniel Wallace lost this argument over TWO years agoPosted Nov 10, 2006 8:45 UTC (Fri) by NZheretic (guest, #409)Parent article: GPL survives antitrust challenge - again Daniel Wallace's crackpot Anti-GPL arguments were repeatedly and utterly refuted back in Febuary 2004.
(Log in to post comments)
Daniel Wallace lost this argument over TWO years ago Posted Nov 10, 2006 9:58 UTC (Fri) by khim (guest, #9252) [Link] It's one thing to have rebuffal from just anyone. It's quite different to have the same said by "well respected (if not always well liked)" judge...
Daniel Wallace lost this argument over TWO years ago Posted Nov 10, 2006 16:42 UTC (Fri) by euvitudo (guest, #98) [Link] Maybe we should thank Daniel Wallace for acting like a crackpot (or being one? I don't know the guy) and making those crackpot arguments, as it has brought these questions to the forefront... Although it thwarts his agenda, it certainly pushes ours. ;^)
|
|
||||||||||||